Files
wren/benchmark/method_call.py
Bob Nystrom 507e89d3b3 Range operators!
Added ".." and "..." infix operators. Num implements them to
return Range objects. Those in turn implement the iterator
protocol, so now numeric for loops are easy:

    for (i in 1..10) { ... }

I also cleaned up the Wren benchmarks to use this.

In the process, I discovered the method_call benchmark really
just showed loop peformance, so I unrolled the loops in all of
the languages to stress method calls.
2013-12-25 15:01:45 -08:00

74 lines
1.8 KiB
Python

#!/usr/bin/python
# http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/
import sys
import time
class Toggle(object):
def __init__(self, start_state):
self.bool = start_state
def value(self):
return(self.bool)
def activate(self):
self.bool = not self.bool
return(self)
class NthToggle(Toggle):
def __init__(self, start_state, max_counter):
Toggle.__init__(self, start_state)
self.count_max = max_counter
self.counter = 0
def activate(self):
self.counter += 1
if (self.counter >= self.count_max):
super(NthToggle, self).activate()
self.counter = 0
return(self)
def main():
start = time.clock()
NUM = 100000
val = 1
toggle = Toggle(val)
for i in xrange(0,NUM):
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
val = toggle.activate().value()
if val:
print "true"
else:
print "false"
val = 1
ntoggle = NthToggle(val, 3)
for i in xrange(0,NUM):
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
val = ntoggle.activate().value()
if val:
print "true"
else:
print "false"
print("elapsed: " + str(time.clock() - start))
main()